Facebook Twitter RSS
magnify
Home Archive for category "Commentary" (Page 6)
formats

Hide Apple’s Newstand App For iPhone

Apparently this is a big deal because I see posts and commentary on it all the time. Apple’s Newstand, for users who want to subscribe to magazines, cannot be removed or even hidden away in an app folder. And for some users this is a HUGE problem. Because you know, you can’t just move it to the last page of your apps.

The reason Newstand cannot be hidden is because it is actually just a special folder, protected by iOS, most likely to help prompt users to buy content from the App Store.

If you’re interested, Macgasm has published the process for hiding your Newstand folder HERE.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
formats

Marco Arment gives Apple Maps a positive review

I thought maybe I was going crazy because in the last week or so I have been using Apple Maps for every drive I have taken to test the results. So far I have had zero mistakes. I’ve asked Siri to find gas stations along my route and gotten great results. The directions I’ve received have been great and if I chose to go a different way the route was updated almost instantly.

So then I thought it was just because I was in Portland, OR, a relatively small city. But check it out. Marco Arment just tweeted that he used Apple Maps all weekend and it worked better than Google Maps for iOS ever did. And he lives in New York. Not only that, but a handful of other people replied with similar results.

What kind of results are you getting?

 
Tags: ,
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
formats

Why People Love to Hate, Love to Love, and Hate to Love Apple

Published on October 7, 2012 by in Apple, Commentary, Culture

Apple, as it turns out, has become all things to everyone. It is the most reviled company on the planet — daring to control its users by encompassing them in a suffocating walled garden, maliciously squashing its competition through litigation, and embodying the total of the worst of morality in its treatment of its Asian workforce. Apple, for many, is the worst. Those people love to hate Apple.

Of course, Apple is also a company that has navigated itself through the years with a greater vision for the world of technology, and often times humanity in general, always striving to provide its customers with an experience that transcends pushing buttons, connecting to networks, and downloading data, creating a lineup of devices and services that truly make our lives better. Apple, for many, is the best. Those people love to love Apple.

And then there is something else. Something that not many companies, or people, can say they inspire. It’s not a Venn diagram situation — the two above types of people do not overlap to create this person. Rather, it is an entirely separate existence. It is not just the technologically savvy, the long-time lovers of all things digital, the nerdiest of the nerds but also the old-time way-doers, the original solution-makers, the way-it-was-ers, and the on-the-fencers. Apple, for them, is a great burden. Those people hate to love Apple.

They hate to love Apple because it means that the way they wish it was, the way they hoped it would be, is not the way it is. To these people Apple represents something bigger than a Maps app that can’t find a few addresses or a dock connector that is proprietary. To these people, Apple is a signal that what they do, and how they do it, is fading away.

The nerds worry because in their perfect world, everyone is a programmer. There is no user interface. There is no iOS. No Siri. Just some code. And users manipulate that code. Users are in control. Not Apple. But now, to these people, Apple is in complete control. And that’s not fair, or smart, or whatever negative connotation they associate with it.

Then, you have the people whose jobs have been affected by technology from Apple. Newspapermen are almost gone. The record label industry is becoming less and less relevant. Any job that was once paper-centric seems to have a looming threat of digitalization hanging over its head, in large part due to Apple’s devices.

We no longer need a magazine in our mailbox — we have 50 magazines on our iPad. Magazine production facilities close. We no longer need to go to a Best Buy or a Sam Goody to buy the latest CD — we download it directly from the iTunes Store to our iPhone or iPod touch. Best Buy stores and Sam Goody stores close.

The nerds love that Apple has all these amazing capabilities in its devices and yet hate that they can’t do what they want with those advancements. They hate to love Apple. The fading industry people love playing Angry Birds, doing FaceTime with their loved ones, and putting grungy filters on their Instagram photos, and yet their jobs are being replaced by 1’s and 0’s. They hate to love Apple.

The undecideds of the world see the controversies on blogs and the evening news, they hear the rhetoric from the love to haters and the love to lovers and have no idea what to think. They see that Apple looks easy, but think the price is too much. They like the idea of being able to do whatever they want, but hate the idea of having to constantly tinker with their device. They hate to love Apple.

And you know what the brilliant thing is? Apple knows these three types of people better than anyone. And who do you think Apple gears all its efforts toward? That’s right, the people that hate to love them.

In general, you can’t do much about the people that love to hate you. They will have their reasons, many of which are irrational, and almost always, they will refuse to have a civil conversation or debate about the sides of the argument. These people will not change their minds.

Similarly, the people that love to love you will not change their minds. If your Maps app isn’t up to snuff, they’ll be critical perhaps, but understanding. They will buy your iPhone 5 and report as many problems as they encounter, knowing full well that those issues will be fixed, and in the grand scheme of things, the effort is worth it. They will defend you on tech blog comment areas and wait in line for the next big product.

But the people that hate to love you? They are the ones that will hear you out. They don’t like some things, and love others. They will buy an iPhone but sing the praises of a PC (while secretly eyeing the MacBook Air every time they walk past an Apple Store). They will sing the praises of openness, citing Android and Linux, while simultaneously wishing video chat worked as easily for them as it does for iPhone users.

Apple is changing the minds of hate to lovers every day. That’s why Apple is successful. Other technology and consumer electronics companies have no clue, and consequently, focus on the other two groups of people, missing opportunities left and right.

I would submit here that no one in modern history has understood the needs of hate to lovers better than Steve Jobs. And not just from a marketing sense, though he was incredible at that, but from a strategic vision sense. He understood what his company needed to be for the hate to lovers, had an uncanny ability to ignore or deal with the love to haters, and was always able grow the love to lovers. He was able to disseminate a great portion of that ability throughout Apple’s corporate culture which is undoubtedly one of his greatest legacies. And for it, Apple will continue to dominate.

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
formats

Google Axes Key Motorola Technology, Cites Lack of Consumer Adoption

Published on October 7, 2012 by in Apple, Commentary, News

I can’t believe no one bought into this!

A great find from John Moltz regarding part of Google’s acquisition of Motorola — Webtop — a technology that was supposed to be the “next thing”, allowing a smartphone to plug in to and power a desktop. It was supposed to be an all-in-one iPhone/Apple killer. Instead, The Verge has reported that Google axed Webtop, citing a lack of consumer adoption.

Moltz:

If [Google] didn’t acquire Motorola to battle Apple on the patent front and they didn’t acquire it for Android-related technologies and they certainly didn’t acquire it for the profit it’s making, why the heck did they acquire it?

Oh, well! It’s just $12.5 billion. It’s not like it was a lot of money or something.

Companies still think that a piece of crap running crap software that has a longer feature list than the iPhone, or iPad, or Mac will beat out Apple. As soon as one of these companies learns that the game is no longer about the tech specs, but rather the consumer experience, then it will have a good shot at competing with Apple.

You would think Google could get there. Of course, when was the last time Google was considered “user friendly”?

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments 
formats

Nokia’s New Anti-Apple Ad Provides Color Commentary

A new ad released by Nokia attempts to take a shot at Apple’s iPhone 5 by painting a picture of a dreary and drab world where everything is in charcoal black and white. You know, because the iPhone only comes in two colors. But the Nokia Lumia comes in lots of colors! Yippeeee! Nothing says marketing genius like slapping a fresh coat of paint on a turd.

Take a look at the Nokia ad:

Here’s the thing: Even if having multiple color options for your phone was something that would sway your decision making process, would this ad really do the trick? There is actually so little color in this ad that now, when I think of the Nokia Lumia, I’m going to be picturing these black and white people.

What do you think? Is this a dumb ad? Or the dumbest ad ever? And could you care any less if your iPhone came in different colors?

[source: Macgasm.net]

 
 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit Share on LinkedIn
No Comments  comments